# Korean SaaS AI Visibility Benchmark 2026-07

**Sample:** 12 Korean B2B SaaS domains sampled from the public web — anonymized category aggregate (individual brands/domains not disclosed)  
**Measured:** 2026-07-23 (conditions v2)  
**Published:** 2026-07-23  
**Sample size:** N=12

## Sample criteria

Inclusion: B2B SaaS operated by Korean companies · public website · spread across 8 sub-verticals · public recognition (news/funding history). Exclusion: consumer-first services, Korean branches of global vendors, and RanketAI itself (conflict of interest). For repeated runs per domain, only the latest valid run enters the distribution.

## Score distribution (0-100)

| p50 | p75 | p90 |
|---|---|---|
| 51 | 59 | 67 |

| A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5 | 0 | 2 |

## Per-platform aggregates

| Platform | Brand mention rate | Own-domain citation rate |
|---|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 33% | 8% |
| Perplexity | 83% | 42% |
| Gemini | 83% | 83% |

## Top third-party cited sources (sample domains excluded)

| Host | Citations |
|---|---|
| youtube.com | 14 |
| impactflow.kr | 13 |
| reviewinsight.blog | 11 |
| tistory.com | 11 |
| blog.naver.com | 10 |
| etnews.com | 10 |
| namu.wiki | 10 |
| zdnet.co.kr | 10 |
| daouoffice.com | 8 |
| comworld.co.kr | 7 |

## Limitations
- Aggregated from 12 domains sampled from the public web — not product telemetry and not a representative sample of the whole industry.
- AI answers vary by model, timing, and question. In same-day repeat runs, individual scores moved within roughly ±10 points and 1 of 12 domains changed grade. A single result does not guarantee long-term trends or business outcomes.
- Based on a single measurement date (2026-07-23); given the small sample, sub-vertical breakdowns and fine-grained percentile reads are limited.

## Methodology (abstract)

Major LLMs (ChatGPT · Gemini · Perplexity) · diverse purchase/comparison/discovery prompt combinations · multi-signal axes

See [https://www.ranketai.com/en/methodology](https://www.ranketai.com/en/methodology) for the full methodology.
